Monthly Archive for November, 2006

The “Grid” is Falling….The “Grid” is Falling

I happened to find this Digg story in the upcoming entries. The “Grid” is Falling….The “Grid” is Falling is about the crappy level of service provided by the new Media Temple “Grid” service.

Since I’ve been thoroughly displeased with the service I’ve had at (mt) over the past several months, I encourage you all to digg that story… for me, please! Not only is their hosting service absolutely atrocious, but their customer service isn’t much better.

For example: Last night all my sites were down. Instant reject for all connections. I open a “Service down or not responding” ticket (which is buried under what’s effectively a “Miscellaneous” category in their web system). At 9:30 this morning they finally respond with a message to the effect of “Yeah, it was a planned downtime.” How exactly was it planned? You didn’t inform any of your customers. The only way I found out about it was by reading the “Internal Incident” report I was linked to by a support rep…

As I said, horrible service. Don’t even think about getting a “grid” server from (mt), you’ll regret it. Please digg the story above, and let me know about any hosting recommendations…

Microsoft Brings some Vista Features to XP

Early this morning, as my insomnia-driven computer addiction ensued at hours in which even the birds refuse to wake, I noticed that a couple of new Windows Updates had been deployed by my in-house WSUS box and were ready for installation on my client machines. I thought we’d already had our patch-Tuesday for the month, so I decided to check out what was being updated.

Much to my surprise, there was a new version of the Microsoft Remote Desktop Connection (aka Terminal Services client) app available. Since, as far as I remember, there has never been an update to this program (since it’s initial inclusion in Windows XP), I thought I’d go check it out.

Thanks to my handy dandy (unofficial) Microsoft Download Notification RSS feed, I was able to quickly track down the stand-alone download package1.

For those that may be interested, the short description of this update is:

Remote Desktop Connection (Terminal Services Client 6.0) provides a way to use any new Terminal Services features introduced in Microsoft Windows Vista and Microsoft Windows Server Code Name “Longhorn” from a computer running Microsoft Windows XP with Service Pack 2 or Microsoft Windows Server 2003 with Service Pack 1.

This simple update boasts a host of changes. Most notably are:

  • Lots of new Authentication updates
  • 32-bit color support
  • Font-smoothing capability
  • Terminal Services “Remote Program” capability
  • Enhanced Device Redirection (for things such as printers connected locally)

My favorite feature, however, is without a doubt the new Monitor Spanning capability. That’s right, now I can finally utilize both of my monitors when doing a remote desktop. Oh sweet joy of joys. Microsoft, sometimes I just can’t help but love you guys2!

For those interested in more details, here’s a link to the stand-alone download, and the knowledge base article3.

Update: In case you have difficulty finding them yourselves, here are download links for other platforms. Still, I’d probably just snag it over Windows Update…

Windows 2003: here
Windows 2003 x64: here
Windows XP x64: here

  1. Oddly enough, Googling around and searching both Microsoft.com and the Microsoft Knowledge Base directly proved to be useless. [back]
  2. And god knows I try not to… [back]
  3. By the way… When did these start requiring passport logins? KB articles have always been publicly available, haven’t they? [back]

Oh No, Could the RIAA actually be Wrong?!

Update: You can directly Digg this story here, or vote for it on Netscape here. The more people who read about this, the more I love you all…

After hearing the news via Digg today that All of MP3 will be closing sometime in the near future, I decided to stock up.

In the process of spending $20 tonight, I decided to check my history with All of MP3 to run some numbers…

Between my slow, slightly suspicious, start on March 7, 2005 and my last purchase prior to today on October 20, 2006, I spent a total of $180.93 to purchase a whopping 1,589 songs.

For those of you unable to operate a calculator, that comes out to 11.38 cents per song…

Assuming I’d have been willing to invest the same $180.93 over the past year in music purchased from the iTunes Music Store1, that would mean I’d have netted 182 songs.

That means that, by using All of MP3.com, I was able to get 1,407 more songs for my money.

Now for the real comparison. I clicked through each pane of the painfully annoying iTunes Music Store purchase history for my account. In the same time period, I spent $1,067.59 at the iTMS on 1,078 songs2.

To sum that all up:

All of MP3: 1,589 songs for $180.93
iTMS: 1,078 songs for $1,067.59

A tad different, no?

For reference, had I purchased those same 1,589 songs originally from All of MP3 at the iTunes Music Store instead, I’d have shelled out $1,573.11 for them3.

As one last note, I’d like to mention that my All of MP3 usage has not grown linearly. There has been an exponential curve to my purchasing over the past several (call it 6) months. Their introduction of the allTunes software package, combined with their ever increasing catalog and more rapid availability of new releases has greatly driven me towards them. These changes have really put it more on-par with the iTMS, in what I’d call real competition.

For a reference of the exponential growth, see this chart:

All of MP3 Purchases over Time

There’s a pretty obvious increase over the past 18 months…

Now, if only I had the patience to figure out some kind of predictive modeling application that would calculate how much I’d have actually spent and how many songs I’d have gotten, had I only had the iTMS as a resource… Still, even to a total laymen, I think it should be pretty obvious that, while I’m certainly willing to spend money on my music, I’m far more willing to buy much more (511 songs in this instance, and don’t forget the exponential growth curve) at a lower price.

Oh no, could the RIAA actually be wrong about how customers buy their music? Nahhh…

  1. To be fair, I did purchase a number of CDs at the iTMS that weren’t yet available on All of MP3, so we’re not strictly talking apples-to-apples all around. Still, that’s $180 spent at All of MP3 that could have been spent anywhere else as well. [back]
  2. Approximately. Since the purchase history doesn’t list the number of songs purchased, I assumed 99 cents each when calculating. Some rounding would also have occurred. Also note that there were 3 free songs listed on my account, which I did not take into account here. Still, the results wouldn’t have been significantly different, had we had exact figures to work with. [back]
  3. Again, assuming an exact 99 cents per song. Once more, give or take a little for a full album isn’t going to make a significant impact on our figures. [back]

Scott Adams on Atheists

You know, I love Scott Adams… He may in fact be the greatest human being ever. Take this quote from his most recent blog post Atheists: The New Gays:

Ask a deeply religious Christian if he’d rather live next to a bearded Muslim that may or may not be plotting a terror attack, or an atheist that may or may not show him how to set up a wireless network in his house. On the scale of prejudice, atheists don’t seem so bad lately.

Thank you, that is all…

And Where Do I Report This…?

So I had just finished reading an email in my main custom domain hosted GMail account and flipped back to my Inbox. Up at the top, my eyes suddenly caught the word “download” out of this ad:

AdSense Ad in Hosted Gmail

In Google’s own application… Where exactly is the “Report Bad Adsense Ads” link on the Adsense page? All I can find is a reference to clicking on the Ads by Goooogle link… Where exactly is that, again? This is GMail!

So instead, I’m just expected to go merrily on my way and let people continue to con innocent GMail users into paying $50 for a pirated version of Office XP? I mean come on, it’s not even the latest version!

Poor showing, Google… Very poor showing. I guess as long as we’ve got their money, who cares, right? Besides, it’s all coming out of a competitor’s pocket anyway…