<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Backup Solutions?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://incoherentbabble.com/2006/02/01/backup-solutions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://incoherentbabble.com/2006/02/01/backup-solutions/</link>
	<description>Tech News and Rambling from a Surly Little Bastard...</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Off-Site Backup Storage at Incoherent Babble</title>
		<link>http://incoherentbabble.com/2006/02/01/backup-solutions/#comment-3517</link>
		<dc:creator>Off-Site Backup Storage at Incoherent Babble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 21:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incoherentbabble.com/2006/02/01/backup-solutions/#comment-3517</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;ve talked about backup solutions recently, and I got some good opinions on how other people handle such things as off-site storage for their respective companies, but now I want to talk about a slightly different variety of off-site backup storage: the personal kind. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&#8217;ve talked about backup solutions recently, and I got some good opinions on how other people handle such things as off-site storage for their respective companies, but now I want to talk about a slightly different variety of off-site backup storage: the personal kind. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MellerTime</title>
		<link>http://incoherentbabble.com/2006/02/01/backup-solutions/#comment-2198</link>
		<dc:creator>MellerTime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 14:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incoherentbabble.com/2006/02/01/backup-solutions/#comment-2198</guid>
		<description>That might indeed be a viable solution, if we had an ISP that gave a shit. Bellsouth is not known to be exactly accomodating (as I'm sure other people who have dealt with them can attest). They would be more than happy to make us upgrade to a T3 line (the most the copper line coming into the building could accomodate - 43mbps?), but somehow I doubt they would give us anything half-way (or even if they could in this particular instance).

Now, if we had that fiber line coming into the building that I'd wanted us to put in, you know, just in case we needed to eventually upgrade to a gigabit link... Then it's just a matter of caps coming in on the line anyway and in theory they should be able to do that. Of course at that point we'd be spending so much money with them each month they'd probably be more flexible with our requests (demands?). We got a new toy (some cool KVM switches) that we're in the process of re-wiring into our racks, so I haven't put much more thought into the backup solution yet, but I think the cheap drives in the crap extra machine is going to be the only viable alternative.

With some luck, it could get expanded into a bunch of removable drives that could be swapped in and out on a regular basis. But we'll cross that $1,000 bridge when we come to it.

Thanks for the sounding board, guys. Let me know if you get anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That might indeed be a viable solution, if we had an <acronym title="Internet Service Provider">ISP</acronym> that gave a shit. Bellsouth is not known to be exactly accomodating (as I&#8217;m sure other people who have dealt with them can attest). They would be more than happy to make us upgrade to a T3 line (the most the copper line coming into the building could accomodate - 43mbps?), but somehow I doubt they would give us anything half-way (or even if they could in this particular instance).</p>
<p>Now, if we had that fiber line coming into the building that I&#8217;d wanted us to put in, you know, just in case we needed to eventually upgrade to a gigabit link&#8230; Then it&#8217;s just a matter of caps coming in on the line anyway and in theory they should be able to do that. Of course at that point we&#8217;d be spending so much money with them each month they&#8217;d probably be more flexible with our requests (demands?). We got a new toy (some cool KVM switches) that we&#8217;re in the process of re-wiring into our racks, so I haven&#8217;t put much more thought into the backup solution yet, but I think the cheap drives in the crap extra machine is going to be the only viable alternative.</p>
<p>With some luck, it could get expanded into a bunch of removable drives that could be swapped in and out on a regular basis. But we&#8217;ll cross that $1,000 bridge when we come to it.</p>
<p>Thanks for the sounding board, guys. Let me know if you get anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abdul Mueid</title>
		<link>http://incoherentbabble.com/2006/02/01/backup-solutions/#comment-2197</link>
		<dc:creator>Abdul Mueid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 13:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incoherentbabble.com/2006/02/01/backup-solutions/#comment-2197</guid>
		<description>Hello Mr. Meller(son) {remind me of the Matrix: Anderson}

I am not sure if this idea is viable, but cant you contact your ISP to remove uplink caps to the offsite server. That way, you'll be able to upload the backups at the maximum speed possible by your operator and since the backup server is in the same town, there wont be any excess international bandwidth charges.

If I get any more revelations, I will let them appear over here :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Mr. Meller(son) {remind me of the Matrix: Anderson}</p>
<p>I am not sure if this idea is viable, but cant you contact your <acronym title="Internet Service Provider">ISP</acronym> to remove uplink caps to the offsite server. That way, you&#8217;ll be able to upload the backups at the maximum speed possible by your operator and since the backup server is in the same town, there wont be any excess international bandwidth charges.</p>
<p>If I get any more revelations, I will let them appear over here <img src='http://incoherentbabble.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MellerTime</title>
		<link>http://incoherentbabble.com/2006/02/01/backup-solutions/#comment-2192</link>
		<dc:creator>MellerTime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incoherentbabble.com/2006/02/01/backup-solutions/#comment-2192</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I think you've come to pretty much the same conclusions as I have, and I've been mulling this over for about 3 months now. The sad reality of the situation is: there's no *ideal* solution that would give me everything that I want.

On the plus side, if we had the live backup system going, we could focus the tapes more on off-site backups and monkey with that process some to more accomodate that need (rather than trying to juggle full backups while keeping the latest copy locally, but also having a pretty recent copy off-site and so forth).

At the very least, it would make the "Oh shit, I didn't mean to click yes to delete that!" scenarios a lot easier to recover from... And the same for the random drag-and-drop "Akk, where'd it go?!" incidents (my god are those common around here... how stupid can you be?).

I hadn't really explored the idea of the removable drives in the backup PC. We'd have to change our system of keeping one copy off site every month (which really, seems very paranoid to me - 12 backups a year off-site?), but if the idea was to simply keep *a* copy of our recent data (once a week) off-site until it was replaced the next week, we'd really only need a few extra drives to maintain the rotation. A couple of enclosures and a TrueCrypt install later, we've got our encrypted removable drives.

Hmm, I shall explore the options further. If anyone else has bright ideas (epiphanies?) please don't keep it to yourselves...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think you&#8217;ve come to pretty much the same conclusions as I have, and I&#8217;ve been mulling this over for about 3 months now. The sad reality of the situation is: there&#8217;s no *ideal* solution that would give me everything that I want.</p>
<p>On the plus side, if we had the live backup system going, we could focus the tapes more on off-site backups and monkey with that process some to more accomodate that need (rather than trying to juggle full backups while keeping the latest copy locally, but also having a pretty recent copy off-site and so forth).</p>
<p>At the very least, it would make the &#8220;Oh shit, I didn&#8217;t mean to click yes to delete that!&#8221; scenarios a lot easier to recover from&#8230; And the same for the random drag-and-drop &#8220;Akk, where&#8217;d it go?!&#8221; incidents (my god are those common around here&#8230; how stupid can you be?).</p>
<p>I hadn&#8217;t really explored the idea of the removable drives in the backup PC. We&#8217;d have to change our system of keeping one copy off site every month (which really, seems very paranoid to me - 12 backups a year off-site?), but if the idea was to simply keep *a* copy of our recent data (once a week) off-site until it was replaced the next week, we&#8217;d really only need a few extra drives to maintain the rotation. A couple of enclosures and a TrueCrypt install later, we&#8217;ve got our encrypted removable drives.</p>
<p>Hmm, I shall explore the options further. If anyone else has bright ideas (epiphanies?) please don&#8217;t keep it to yourselves&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cal</title>
		<link>http://incoherentbabble.com/2006/02/01/backup-solutions/#comment-2191</link>
		<dc:creator>Cal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 03:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incoherentbabble.com/2006/02/01/backup-solutions/#comment-2191</guid>
		<description>Backup to the old PC with a removable hard drive (encrypted backup) and give that to the boss to take home each night.

See how long he keeps it up, especially as he then has to remember to bring the disks in to keep the rotation going...  You might just get that new file server.

After that I'm fresh out of ideas at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Backup to the old PC with a removable hard drive (encrypted backup) and give that to the boss to take home each night.</p>
<p>See how long he keeps it up, especially as he then has to remember to bring the disks in to keep the rotation going&#8230;  You might just get that new file server.</p>
<p>After that I&#8217;m fresh out of ideas at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MellerTime</title>
		<link>http://incoherentbabble.com/2006/02/01/backup-solutions/#comment-2189</link>
		<dc:creator>MellerTime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 02:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incoherentbabble.com/2006/02/01/backup-solutions/#comment-2189</guid>
		<description>I've done some rough estimates in my head for downtime. In between flashes of "oh my god, it'd be horrible" that re-surface during my nightmares on a regular basis, I came to the realization that it just wouldn't happen. I know it sounds crazy (and it probably is), but there's no way I see that they would agree to spend another $6,000 and have the server sit there "doing nothing" all the time. It's another one of those mindsets where you'll have to get burned by it before you take steps to prevent it. No matter how many times I say "you realize how long it would take to restore that if it were lost", they bring back up the "well if the building burns down, that's going to be one of the least of our worries" answer. Pointing out that the building doesn't have to burn down for our file server to go poof doesn't help, and I've long since given up trying. It's not good, but it's life in a small company, and I've moved along.

Performing full backups every night was a conscious decision on our part to help keep things simple. We've got untrained operations people (read: computer morons) swapping tapes and doing other menial day-to-day tasks of that sort. If we were to do a full backup today, then do only differentials from now on, we would eventually get to the point where the tape would fill up and sprout and error and send these idiots into an utter panic when something doesn't "look right". I would then instantly have to drop whatever I was doing and assist them and reassure them it was really alright, that we knew this would happen eventually. At which point, they would then proceed to insist in the future that I don't know what I'm doing and that any future issues are obviously related to this one. In the end, we established it was much easier for everyone involved if we just did full backups every night, particularly to avoid confusion as to which copies should go off-site (with full backups every night, it doesn't matter - pick one out of the stack).

I suppose online backups would be at least feasible at this point, but with only 150kb/s upload speeds, it just wouldn't work. Now that I actually run some numbers in my head, it's even more out of the question than it was before:

Oracle backups - ~4gb x 2
Exchange backup - 14gb (last I checked)
Updates server backup - 10gb (again, last I checked)

There's more, but we can round off to 30gb for these purposes. At 160kb/s upload, we're talking about 2 days. Again we'd run into problems doing incrementals of all that stuff (particularly things like Exchange).

So once again we're back to a local on-site hardware solution... Any other ideas?

Oh, and Tomas, Jeffry and Pah said they were out of stock... Blasted Chief. I think he's secretly trying to corner the market so he can launch his own brand of MonkeyTapes.

For anyone else wondering what the hell I was just talking about, go read &lt;a href="http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/security/investigator/archives/006760.asp" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Case of the Tepid Tipster&lt;/a&gt;, one of everyone's favorite blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve done some rough estimates in my head for downtime. In between flashes of &#8220;oh my god, it&#8217;d be horrible&#8221; that re-surface during my nightmares on a regular basis, I came to the realization that it just wouldn&#8217;t happen. I know it sounds crazy (and it probably is), but there&#8217;s no way I see that they would agree to spend another $6,000 and have the server sit there &#8220;doing nothing&#8221; all the time. It&#8217;s another one of those mindsets where you&#8217;ll have to get burned by it before you take steps to prevent it. No matter how many times I say &#8220;you realize how long it would take to restore that if it were lost&#8221;, they bring back up the &#8220;well if the building burns down, that&#8217;s going to be one of the least of our worries&#8221; answer. Pointing out that the building doesn&#8217;t have to burn down for our file server to go poof doesn&#8217;t help, and I&#8217;ve long since given up trying. It&#8217;s not good, but it&#8217;s life in a small company, and I&#8217;ve moved along.</p>
<p>Performing full backups every night was a conscious decision on our part to help keep things simple. We&#8217;ve got untrained operations people (read: computer morons) swapping tapes and doing other menial day-to-day tasks of that sort. If we were to do a full backup today, then do only differentials from now on, we would eventually get to the point where the tape would fill up and sprout and error and send these idiots into an utter panic when something doesn&#8217;t &#8220;look right&#8221;. I would then instantly have to drop whatever I was doing and assist them and reassure them it was really alright, that we knew this would happen eventually. At which point, they would then proceed to insist in the future that I don&#8217;t know what I&#8217;m doing and that any future issues are obviously related to this one. In the end, we established it was much easier for everyone involved if we just did full backups every night, particularly to avoid confusion as to which copies should go off-site (with full backups every night, it doesn&#8217;t matter - pick one out of the stack).</p>
<p>I suppose online backups would be at least feasible at this point, but with only 150kb/s upload speeds, it just wouldn&#8217;t work. Now that I actually run some numbers in my head, it&#8217;s even more out of the question than it was before:</p>
<p>Oracle backups - ~4gb x 2<br />
Exchange backup - 14gb (last I checked)<br />
Updates server backup - 10gb (again, last I checked)</p>
<p>There&#8217;s more, but we can round off to 30gb for these purposes. At 160kb/s upload, we&#8217;re talking about 2 days. Again we&#8217;d run into problems doing incrementals of all that stuff (particularly things like Exchange).</p>
<p>So once again we&#8217;re back to a local on-site hardware solution&#8230; Any other ideas?</p>
<p>Oh, and Tomas, Jeffry and Pah said they were out of stock&#8230; Blasted Chief. I think he&#8217;s secretly trying to corner the market so he can launch his own brand of MonkeyTapes.</p>
<p>For anyone else wondering what the hell I was just talking about, go read <a href="http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/security/investigator/archives/006760.asp" rel="nofollow">The Case of the Tepid Tipster</a>, one of everyone&#8217;s favorite blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cal</title>
		<link>http://incoherentbabble.com/2006/02/01/backup-solutions/#comment-2188</link>
		<dc:creator>Cal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 02:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incoherentbabble.com/2006/02/01/backup-solutions/#comment-2188</guid>
		<description>Oh yes - forgot to mention "Allison Technologies" can most probably do you a good deal on cheap used tapes...

(Think about it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes - forgot to mention &#8220;Allison Technologies&#8221; can most probably do you a good deal on cheap used tapes&#8230;</p>
<p>(Think about it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cal</title>
		<link>http://incoherentbabble.com/2006/02/01/backup-solutions/#comment-2187</link>
		<dc:creator>Cal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 02:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incoherentbabble.com/2006/02/01/backup-solutions/#comment-2187</guid>
		<description>You say the $6,000 file server isn't going to fly, but has anyone done the sums for how much time (read money) it will take to do a resore from scratch if you lose the live system?  Not to mention the lower service level that clients will be experiencing due to the staff not having all the info available.

Why are you using 2 tapes a night?  Aren't you doing a GFS (Grandfather, father, son) schedule, and only backing up changes?  This also makes it quicker to find that 20kb file.

As for offsite, it you are only backing up the changes, it won't take too long to shove that over the internet to somewhere each night will it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say the $6,000 file server isn&#8217;t going to fly, but has anyone done the sums for how much time (read money) it will take to do a resore from scratch if you lose the live system?  Not to mention the lower service level that clients will be experiencing due to the staff not having all the info available.</p>
<p>Why are you using 2 tapes a night?  Aren&#8217;t you doing a GFS (Grandfather, father, son) schedule, and only backing up changes?  This also makes it quicker to find that 20kb file.</p>
<p>As for offsite, it you are only backing up the changes, it won&#8217;t take too long to shove that over the internet to somewhere each night will it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
