Monthly Archive for September, 2005

Summary RSS Feed Rant

I don’t know that I’ve ever gotten frustrated enough to rant about it before, but if there’s one thing you remember about me, it should be that I hate, hate, HATE “Summary” RSS feeds. If you’re going to publish an RSS feed, make the damn thing full-text!

I absolutely despise it when I open up a new item whose title interests me, start reading, and then just as I get into the subject, BAM! “Read more…” or “Continue reading…” or just plain “…”. 90% of the time I’ll flat out refuse to continue reading, no matter how interested I was in the topic being discussed.

At this point, I’ve weeded out virtually all of the blogs in my reader that don’t provide full-text feeds. Unfortunately, I’ve also come across several people lately that I’d like to read on a regular basis, but I just can’t stomach their short hacked-to-death feeds. That’s right Craig, I’m talking about you… Babz too. I may put up with this kind of crap from a company that’s out to make a big profit, but after I get through all the ITToolbox blogs, I have very little patience for summaries.

Unless you’re blogging for profit (and then only if you’ve been rejected by AdSense for RSS), there’s absolutely no reason you should make me visit your website to finish reading an article. There are plenty of other ways to get me to check out your site, should there actually be a legitimate reason for me to do so. Hell, even most of the for-profit bloggers still give you full feeds…

Switching to FeedLounge and Blog Overload

After reading Alex King’s post today about how he uses FeedLounge on a regular basis, I decided it was about time that I gave these guys another go as my regular reader of choice. Throughout their testing phase thus far, I’ve continued using NewsGator as my primary reader, simply because it was always up, and I knew how it was going to behave day after day. When I needed my news, it was there. Now that the FeedLounge guys have some kick ass servers running, it was time to make the switch.

While I was importing my OPML file from NewsGator into FeedLounge, I decided it was time to do some house cleaning. I’d somehow managed to get 108 feeds in NewsGator Online, and was experiencing some total information overload. Not to mention that I’ve realized NewsGator will apparently stop collecting new blog entries after so many unread ones pile up for a feed. For people like Scoble, this can be a problem. Just because I don’t check him one day, doesn’t mean it should randomly stop at 20 entries… He just posts that much guys! Big faux pas guys…

I decided while I was organizing my feeds, I would take some of the tips from over at 43 Folders. Sure they’re meant for organizing your email life, but since I live in my feed reader more than I do my email inbox, I figured it was time to adapt them for my use.

Namely, I created a new tag set in FeedLounge called “blogs-regular-reads”. In it you’ll find people like Scoble, the funny comic Ctrl+Alt+Del, Download Squad, Ed Bott, as well as several other people I always make sure to read on a daily basis, as soon as they publish something. Sure I’ll still skim through all the other feeds I have laying around in other tags, but not nearly as often. The “Regular Reads” group are my A-listers. If I don’t read these guys on a regular basis, I feel like I’m not wearing pants or something… Which makes it really weird reading Scoble’s blog now that I think about it…

After my organization campaign, it was time for some plain old fashioned house cleaning. I know the stats in FeedLounge are nowhere near correct (I don’t have 2,033 unread items… only 100 now), but I’d hazard to guess that I cut out about 20 blogs from my list, bringing me down to a more reasonable 80-ish feeds.

Welp guys, looks like you’ve got another full-time user on your hands. Now where are some cool new features? :)

One of the Best Firefox Reviews Yet…

Welp, I found Babz through my new WordPress.com Dashboard, and just read her Firefox Review. I have to say, it’s one of the best I’ve seen yet.

I know, I know… before you beat me to death with an extension, let me explain why!

The beauty comes in its simplicity. Most of the Firefox reviews I’ve read have been horribly in-depth (for the average layman), going into details about the better CSS and W3C standards support and how great and easy the extension programming interface is… Now that’s all well and good if we want to attract the geek community, but programmers and other IT professionals aren’t the ones you usually have to convince to use something like this, now are they? How about we write a review highlighting the features (and problems) that will get your grandmother to use (or not use) Firefox?

Well, that’s what this review is about… The things ordinary people who surf the web casually for business and pleasure are going to give a shit about… Not how cool it is for them to be standards compliant, and not how easy it would be for some nerd somewhere to write a plugin to support their toaster as a web-app. They don’t know what these “standards” people keep talking about, and they don’t want their toaster to turn on every time they visit a page that isn’t valid XHTML 1.0 Strict. All they care about is how easy it is to use on a daily basis, and what the effort to install it will buy them in the end.

Babz does a good job of explaining these points. Yes, it will take longer for Firefox to start up than IE. IE is mostly memory-resident because, as Microsoft said during their anti-trust litigation, it’s so intertwined with Windows that neither cound function on its own without the other. Firefox has nothing to do with Windows. It’s not dependent on Windows (and in fact runs on virtually any other operating system you could come up with), and Windows doesn’t lean on it for functionality either (although it would be pretty cool if it did).

The extensions system is incredibly easy to use, and allows for virtually endless capabilities and customization, but at a cost: time. I can easily spend several hours configuring a virgin Firefox install to my likings. After installing a dozen or more extensions and plugins, I have to go back and set the preferences for all these plugins. Some of them have export / import utilities, most don’t. Then there are several hacks I have to manually do using the “config:” commands that also aren’t easily done otherwise (if at all). Sure most people aren’t going to do all this, so what do they care how extensible Firefox is? If it’s going to take them an hour to setup and then force them to check for more updates on a regular basis, it’s not worth the hassel.

So really, what does Firefox gain the regular user? Well, tabbed browsing is a firm plus in my book. Windows XP natively supports something pretty similar when it groups up all your like-minded windows together in the taskbar. For those of us running Linux, we certainly appreciate tabbed browsing in Firefox, because Gnome doesn’t support anything like this (something I find very lacking… at least group all my program windows next to each other on the taskbar!). For the casual web-browser at work or checking the weather and sports scores at home, this still probably isn’t a big deal. They only have 2 or 3 windows open at a time, so there’s not a lot of clutter going on.

After that, we’ve got the link toolbar Babz mentions, which actually exists in IE as well, so we can’t really count it, it’s just something we expect to be there. Oh, it just happens to be visible by default in Firefox, whereas IE 6 (which ships with Windows XP) dumps it off to the right of the address bar, making it hidden and useless (right next to that big green “Go” button you probably have never used or noticed).

The last thing Babz mentions is the display differences for webpages when viewed in Firefox versus IE. This one is the big catcher. Most geeks won’t mind a little visual imperfection here and there in the name of hard-core standards support. Unfortunately, we’ve already established that we’re not targeting them, haven’t we? For everyone else who doesn’t have a clue about standards compliance and doesn’t particularly feel negligent in their ignorance, visual imperfections and functional incompatibilities in their favorite webpages are going to be a big problem. Personally, I haven’t used IE in years, and really don’t notice many pages that have problems. The ocassional banking site may have a problem here or there with some funky Javascript or ActiveX control, but mine works just fine in Firefox, so I’m quite happy to remain there. Unfortunately, most “common people” won’t be. If their favorite flash-based game site doesn’t work properly, they’re out of here. If their favorite porn site doesn’t work properly, they’re out of here (incidentally, I can virtually guarantee you they all do. I mean, these sites are targeting geeks, right? Besides, I’ve personally tested more than my fair share of them…)…

So what’s my point through all of this? Well, I guess it’s the unfortunate truth that Firefox really doesn’t have all that much to offer the common person. Sure it has some rudimentary popup blocking that I’m pretty happy with, but everybody and his brother has that these days, including IE in Windows XP SP2. Tack on a Google or Yahoo! toolbar with popup blocking and you’ve eliminated one of the few pluses we have for the everyday user. If the Firefox developers want to really take over the market from IE, they’re going to have to come up with something much better than this. I realize one of the goals of the project is to create a light-weight browser, but maybe we need to consider integrating some of the more popular extensions into core functionality. Maybe even a sidebar that allowed easy one-click installs of some of the most popular plugins (without the annoying “unsigned code” box that makes you wait 5 bloody seconds) would make the barrier for enterance low enough for real adoption.

Overall, I give Babz’s review of Firefox flying colors for her (unique) view from the perspective of the common user. Take that all you Firefox nerds!

iPod Nano

I’ve heard quite a bit about problems with the iPod Nano scratching very easily, even when simply put in contact with normal clothing fabric. The most prominent story is probably one over on Engadget talking about it, but you can also find numorous complains on the Apple forums about this problem.

I don’t know about you guys, but I always find it a tad hard to believe when random people complain about failures in a product. I mean, how bad could a few scratches actually be? The back of my 40 gig iPod (pre-death) was all kinds of scratched, but honestly, did it matter?

Welp, now I’ve got a reputable source: Matt… Looks like I’ll be waiting until the Nano gen2 comes around to invest my life savings into one (kinda sad that’s all I have saved, isn’t it?)… Anyone else have something to say about the Nano? I’d love to hear some more in-depth opinions of it, both good and bad.

Calling Yahoo!, Come in Yahoo!

Hey Yahoo!, wanna tell me why your Search Portal’s Local Search doesn’t give me the option to pick from my saved locations?

Yahoo! Search Local

If I flip over to Yahoo! Local Search, I get a great little drop down box with my locations, including all the recent ones I haven’t even saved:

Yahoo! Local Search

So what’s the logic here? Let me guess, we’ve got one group working on Local Search, and another group working on the generic Search portal, and neither of them know how to talk to each other… Sounds like a typical big company to me, but really I don’t care why it’s happened, just fix it!